The Future of Advertisements

Half Of All Advertising Doesn’t Work, The Trouble Is We Don’t Know Which Half ” still reigns supreme in the world of advertising.


Emerging new technology, shifting consumer behavior, always on consumer touch points and evolving new media are converging to create a new paradigm in advertising.

Advertising – Traditional, SEM, Social Media or Mobile ?

Universally almost all purchase decisions can be categorized into either a High-Involvement Purchase (ex: Home Appliance) or a Low Involvement Purchase (ex: Grocery). The former entails significant risks, is driven by situational needs and involves complex decision making. The latter seeks to minimize time, as Low-Involvement products engulf eighty percent of all purchases, is predisposed to impulse buying and familiarity/awareness plays a  key role.

It is no surprise than that most of the advertising (traditional) we see and hear around us encompasses Low-Involvement products.

Then the internet came along and SEM captured the attention of marketers. As a platform Internet offered conversations with and between buyers to be captured and acted on.

The one notable difference – Internet Search is preceded in most cases by a situational need (i.e. most buyers are either looking for something specific or researching a product category). In certain cases an enduring need also finds expression on the internet in the form of Blogs, Chat-Boards, User Forums or Special Interest Groups to name a few.

One could argue that SEM is ideally suited for High-Involvement products, but this does not seem to be the case. There is a reason behind this….. Legacy for one and….Risk Aversion for another.

With Social Networks people share rich information about their lifestyle, habits, interests and needs on an ongoing basis. A new dimension – Individual Behavioral Data is now available to marketers. What we get with Social Network Advertising is a hybrid between traditional and internet advertising.

With Mobile web we are on the cusp of something phenomenal. An ability to bring together all elements from Traditional, SEM and Social Network Advertising in a way unimaginable until now.

The Elusive Target:

According to The 2011 Digital Marketer, Benchmark and Trend ReportThe most influential element driving purchase decisions today is still  Word of Mouth (54 percent), followed by information from a Website (47 percent).” Advertising in video games and on mobile phones seems to influence far fewer consumers in purchase decisions.

That for you is the dichotomy facing advertisers: How to target advertisements effectively, in what media, to whom, where and when. 

Consider the decisions confronting a marketer when trying to influence a new car buyer. Depending on the buyer’s needs and life-stage a simplified decision matrix could yield 16 different options resulting in a specific choice of vehicle make and model.

NewCarBuyerDecision

Traditional means of serving an AD to such a prospective car buyer is a “Hit-or-Miss” game of chance. While Internet Advertising (SEM) added a new level of dimension by tying AD’s to the “search keyword” it is still blind to the prevailing need driving the search.

Critical information on Individual Buyer’s behavior and his or her preferences at various stages in the decision cycle eluded advertisers and advertising platforms. Today this data can be a near certainty.

Out with the Old in with the New:

The Old: The old world of Advertising relied on eyeballs, media concentration, economies of scale, POS data and consumer surveys to create awareness, cultivate brand attitudes and induce purchase intentions.

It did so using a careful selection and allocation of advertising spending across fifteen different media with the aim of maximizing reach and effectiveness.

EvolvingADMedia-Final

The New: Platforms today are flush with rich behavioral data on shoppers, their life-style, geo-demographics, touch points and interactions as they happen in real-time.

In addition the incremental cost of delivering an AD impression today in ‘”Real-Time” is nearing “ZERO”. The ramifications are clear, an era of 1-ON-1 advertising is on the cusp.

The new age of advertising is all about capturing rich information flows in real-time within and across media platforms. Economies of scale or leveraging the networks with the largest reach become secondary as fragmentation is the norm.

New Rules of Advertising:

  1. Multi-homing – New age consumers will move seamlessly between platforms and media– with platform service providers incurring most of the multi-homing costs.
  2. Spatial vs. Temporal Relevance – The new advertising paradigm is all about harnessing relationships-interactions and developing models that morph information. The frantic bidding to secure the most coveted time slot will lose prominence.
  3. Real-Time / 1-ON-1 – The era of real-time, personalized on the fly AD delivery is here to stay.
  4. Ubiquitous Network – AD impression and delivery must traverse the intended target’s choice of platform across the behavioral sequence model.
  5. AD Markers – Just as DNA holds key genetic information governing humans, so too will AD Markers come to define buyers.

Update Sep-21, 2011: WSJ Article: “TV Lures Ads but Viewers Drop out”


References:

  1. Consumer Behavior – A Strategic Approach, Henry Assael
  2. IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report, April 2011
  3. The 2011 Digital Marketer: Benchmark and Trend Report
  4. Radio & Television Business Report

Update: Facebook, $1 Billion Company, 2010 ?

A quick recap on where Facebook stands in Advertisement Revenues. According to the latest data released by comScore, Facebook has edged out Yahoo, the leader in Banner Ads as of Q1 2010.

Facebook is expected to bring in more than $1 billion this year(2010) in revenues, according to WSJ article citing people briefed on the matter. Yahoo earned $6.5 billion in revenue in 2009, mostly from advertising.

As I had predicted in my blog posting earlier (Facebook, $1 Billion Company, July 2009) “Social-Context Ads” offer marketers unmatched value proposition when it comes to the following:

  1. Increasing Ad Awareness
  2. Building Brand Loyalty
  3. Initiating Purchase Intentions

All of which can be accomplished under finer control, better targeting and higher ROI on Advertising dollars. According to comScore, the average price of display ads on social-networking sites is about one-sixth the price on the rest of the Internet.

FaceBookADImpressions-July8th 2010 WSJ

Looking back Facebook has delivered better than expected results and my projections of hitting $1 Billion revenues by 2014 seems overly pessimistic. Kudos to them on the perfect execution….. what about User Privacy Rights one might argue?

It is my belief that as individuals we are all driven by the pursuit of profits(benefits) and maximizing our utility from engaging in any kind of activity. As long as the benefits from participating on Facebook far outweigh the risks associated with privacy rights, individuals will continue to both participate and share information with others. The jury is still out and time will tell…….

For further reading on Facebook’s Advertising business and limitations of traditional online advertising check out these links:

Facebook, $1 Billion Company ?

Advertisers annually spend about $265 billion across 11 different types of media to reach U.S. consumers.

Facebook, has established itself as a social networking site to reckon with and potentially see revenues of $1 Billion by 2015. The audacious goal seems very much possible in light of the following trends:

  1. Contraction in offline Ad spending as advertisers migrates to less expensive media with better ROI potential. Online advertisement is the best obvious choice.
  2. The advent of DVR has deprived television advertisers of a valuable stream to reach a large user base.
  3. Declining Newspaper subscriptions (7%) will force advertisers to reallocate their budgets and find new means to deliver national and local advertisements. Historically newspapers have accounted for a 2.5 x multiple for each AD impression served per household.
  4. Paid Search Advertisements while very effective for National Brand advertisers has failed to generate the same kind of impact for local and small businesses.

Social Networking sites come closest to replicating the 2.5 x multiple for each AD impression served because a typical user is connected to 100’s of other users, friends and family. Facebook definitely has the potential to address all or some of the above challenges and offers advertisers a unique value proposition.

Revenue projections assuming a modest 5% market share for Facebook, of the overall graphical advertising market, put revenues from advertising alone to about $800 Million by 2015.

Local Online Advertisements

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Annual Local Online Ad Impressions Served (Billions)2

296

342

342

342

342

Facebook: Share of Local Online Ad Impressions

2.00%

2.64%

3.48%

4.60%

5.52%

Facebook Local AD Impression Multiple

3

3

3

3

3

Cost per thousand impressions (CPM)

$7.50

$7.43

$7.35

$7.28

$7 click here now.20

Annual Local AD Revenues

$133,105,500

$200,903,319

$262,540,457

$343,087,869

$407,588,389

National Online Annual Advertisements

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

National Online Ad Impressions Served (Billions)1

2,689

2,823

2,823

2,823

2,823

Facebook: Share of Online Ad Impressions

2.00%

2.60%

3.12%

3.74%

4.49%

Facebook AD Impression Multiple

2

2

2

2

2

Cost per thousand impressions (CPM)

$1.15

$1.13

$1.12

$1.10

$1.08

Annual National AD Revenues

$123,694,000

$166,309,675

$196,578,036

$232,355,239

$274,643,892

Total Annual AD Revenues

$256,799,500

$367,212,994

$459,118,493

$575,443,108

$682,232,281

References:

  1. J.P Morgan Global Equity Research, Jan 2009
  2. Economics of Search Marketing, Borrell Associates, June 2009
  3. IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report, 2008